The murky, potentially unexciting, world of family museums was explored in Old Fashioned Murder – the second episode of Columbo‘s sixth season, which aired on 28 November, 1976.
With a six-month break after this until the third and final episode of the truncated season, surely the creators would pull out all the stops to ensure viewers were left hankering for more by delivering a riveting adventure?
So, is Old Fashioned Murder a solid gold belt buckle of an episode, or is it more of a rusty old pot? Let’s turn our watches forward twice after midnight and stitch up our favourite nieces as we find out…
Dramatis personae
Lieutenant Columbo: Peter Falk
Ruth Lytton: Joyce Van Patten
Edward Lytton: Tim O’Connor
Phyllis Lytton-Brandt: Celeste Holm
Janie Brandt: Jeannie Berlin
Milton Schaeffer: Peter S. Feibleman
Sergeant Miller: Jon Miller
Dr Tim Schaeffer: Jeff Osuna
Darryl: Anthony Holland
Watch salesman: Gary Krawford
Written by: Peter S. Feibleman (from a story by Peter S. Fischer as Lawrence Vail)
Directed by: Robert Douglas
Score by: Dick De Benedictis
Significant locations: Lytton Museum (Doheny Mansion, 10 Chester Place, LA)
Episode synopsis: Columbo Old Fashioned Murder
Middle-age spinstress Ruth Lytton’s decades-long devotion to her family museum is hanging by a thread. Sick of it losing money hand over fist, elder brother Edward has vowed to shut it down and sell off its assets so the three old-money Lytton siblings (including shallow, socialite sister Phyllis) can swim in loot for the rest of their days.
Ruthy won’t take this affront lying down. Instead she plots with down-on-his-luck museum security guard Milton Schaeffer. If he’ll break into the museum that night and steal some select, highly valuable relics, she’ll pay him $100,000 – ostensibly so she can claim them on insurance to solve the museum’s funding crisis.
To seal the deal, she also promises to supply Shaeffer with a phony passport so he can split the country and start a new life in in the tropics with his ill-gotten gains. All he needs to do is rob the museum at 2am, and meet her afterwards to swap the artifacts for cash and passport. What could go wrong?
Shaeffer, who is being tailed by thugs keen to recoup his gambling debts, agrees to this tomfoolery. He has to appear to be dead to get away clean, so, at Ruth’s behest, he rings his brother at 9pm and leaves an answer machine message in which he pretends to be in danger, and which he ends by firing a gun close to the receiver.
Meanwhile, back at Lytton HQ, sisters Ruth and Phyllis chat to young Janie – Phyllis’s daughter – who has returned home from a date with Schaeffer’s brother at 11pm. Janie should be helping Uncle Edward with his all-night inventory of the museum’s stock, but Ruth gave her niece a hall pass so she could put her murderous plan into action with no witnesses.
Once sister and niece are abed, Ruth heads to the museum. Schaeffer is there, stealing the items he was told to take like a good little puppy, and is surprised to see Ruth. He’s even more surprised when she guns him down in cold blood beside the museum’s payphone booth.
Edward, who is still cataloging items on cassette, comes to investigate. He, too, is surprised to see Ruth and uktra-surprised as she pops a cap in his chest with the revolver she’s just taken from Shaeffer’s corpse. She then places the revolver in Schaeffer’s dead hand, puts the other gun in Edward’s hand, flips the phone off the hook and beats her retreat – turning off the room light as she leaves.
Columbo is on the case early next day. Schaeffer’s brother has uncovered the answer machine message and is in a PANIC, believing his luckless sibling to have been slain! Columbo’s investigations thus takes him to the Lytton house for he has heard Schaeffer was fired from his job by Edward the day before (a lie concocted by Ruth), and he wishes to speak to the fella.
Instead he is greeted by Ruth, who tells him that Edward is sleeping after a late night and she won’t wake him. She’s gracious enough to provide the Lieutenant with a cup of chamomile tea to help ease his spring hay fever sniffles before introducing the detective to Janie and Phyllis. The histrionic Phyllis promptly faints dead away on the living room floor. She has no head for foul play…
Still, the police have no corpus delicti to prove Schaeffer is dead, so Ruth puts the next phase of her plan into action. She and Janie head to the museum to continue the inventory so Edward can ‘sleep’. Knowing full well where the bodies are, Ruth rather cruelly sends Janie off on her own and the young woman duly finds the two stiffs – as well as a mother lode of fist-biting trauma! Columbo’s real investigation is about to begin.
Columbo’s dutiful underling, Sergeant Miller, has left the crime scene exactly as it was found. The Lieutenant is immediately puzzled by why the lights were off. It appears that Schaeffer and Edward shot each other at the exact same time. So who turned off the lights? In darkness, neither would have been able to see the other clearly enough to fire accurately – although no one ever suggests the obvious that Edward could have fallen against the switch when dropping dead.
Then there’s the matter of Schaeffer’s outfit. He’s wearing a tropical shirt, brand new shoes, a new calendar watch and has had a haircut and manicure. It looks for all the world like he’s heading off on holiday, but there was no luggage and no passport in his car outside, nor at his apartment. Miller thinks the victim was dressed for Vegas, but Columbo has noted the vaccination mark on his arm. Schaeffer was heading overseas.
The contents of Schaeffer’s brief case and pockets are also confusing – especially an enigmatic note that reads ‘Turn twice after midnight‘. Whatever could it mean? The Lieutenant believes the message could be directions Schaeffer was following within the museum to meet an accomplice. But at the moment it’s all guess work.
He does have some hard evidence, though, that leads him to a hairdressing salon (where Schaeffer had had a trim and manicure) and a watch seller’s, where Columbo learns that ‘turn twice after midnight’ was not a set of directions, but was actually a reminder Schaeffer wrote himself to wind his watch forward twice in order to set the correct date of 1 May (not 31 April) on his calendar.
While this is all a little confusing, Columbo does at least extrapolate that Schaeffer was very likely alive until after midnight on the night of his murder, and that his 9pm call to his brother was bogus (duuuude).
He reveals this tid-bit to Ruth, who is savvy enough to realise that all the female Lyttons are now viable suspects as none of them had alibis after midnight. So part three of her plan goes into action: divert suspicion onto poor, innocent Janie! To do so, she plants a solid gold belt buckle in Janie’s wardrobe – an item she tells Columbo has been missing from the museum for 2 weeks.
Adding up various pieces of evidence, the Lieutenant requests a search warrant, which throws up the belt buckle in Janie’s wardrobe. As Janie is read her rights by Sergeant Miller, Phyllis helpfully passes out…
Visiting Janie in her cell, Columbo brings a variety of items with him – including food, cigarettes and the gold belt buckle, which Janie uses as an ashtray. He then starts talking about the many skeletons in the Lytton family closet – namely the relationship between Phyllis and Ruth, and the death of Janie’s father.
Columbo has discovered that Janie was born 6 months after Phyllis married Peter Brandt. This means she must have been three months pregnant at the time they wed – rather scandalous for a socialite, no?
He’s also looked into the conditions surrounding the death of Peter Brandt when Janie was just 7. He was recovering from a heart attack and being nursed at the Lytton home by Ruth. Could Ruth, bitter and resentful at past humiliation, have caused his second, fatal, heart attack? The very suggestion infuriates Janie, who closes down the conversation for good.
Later that evening, Columbo interrupts the Lytton sisters’ dinner. He’s releasing Janie into their custody because he doesn’t think she’s had any part to play in the double homicide. Why? Because she was using the supposedly stolen belt buckle as an ashtray all afternoon. She had no idea what it was, let alone whether it was a valuable antique.
He also has evidence to suggest that Ruth’s story that the buckle has been missing for 2 weeks is a load of baloney. After spending hours listening to Edward’s inventory on cassette, Columbo finds a description of the buckle recorded on the night of the murders. Ruth has been lying. And when the case goes to court, all the family’s secrets will be laid bare.
In order to save Janie from further heartache, Ruth insists Columbo admit he had lied about implicating Ruth in the death of Peter Brandt. The detective retracts his statement and Ruth turns herself over to him. Columbo takes Ruth’s arm and escorts her out of the house with her dignity intact as credits roll…
Old Fashioned Murder‘s best moment: the sensitive stylist
Columbo was in for a shock to the system when he paid an innocent visit to Darryl’s hair salon seeking information on murder victim Milton Schaeffer’s new haircut and manicure.
Keen to interview Darryl in the middle of a busy working day, the stylist is having none of it. When Columbo duly informs him that it’s a murder investigation, and if Darryl won’t be more helpful he’ll have to accompany the detective downtown, the crazed coiffeur goes into meltdown!
“Well, go right ahead. Arrest me!” he taunts. “Do you have the handcuffs with you? Why don’t you handcuff me? I’m surprised you don’t beat me unconscious so you can carry me out so I don’t cause trouble!”
A bemused and embarrassed Columbo only manages to defuse the pressure-cooker situation by requesting a haircut – cue a very different, sleek look for the Lieutenant’s usually unruly mop. The piece de resistance? He doesn’t have enough money to pay for the styling and manicure, so has to ask the dapper Sergeant Miller to cover him!
Even more fun follows when the watch shop assistant recognises Darryl’s handiwork, pouts suggestively at Columbo and compliments him on his new look! These are the only genuinely funny moments in the whole episode, and Darryl’s histrionics add much-needed energy to a plodding outing. Enjoy a snippet below…
My take on Old Fashioned Murder
If ever an episode premise was going to disinterest viewers from the get-go, a tale of an ageing spinster committing murder to safeguard a family museum was going to be it.
It hardly sounds gripping, and despite the best efforts of the capable and likable Joyce Van Patten, I imagine Old Fashioned Murder struggles to gauge any sort of strong emotional reaction from the average viewer, who is more likely to be quietly bored than on the edge of their seat throughout.
That’s a great shame for Van Patten, who can’t be faulted in the role of Ruth Lytton. She ably portrays a sympathetic, intelligent killer, giving Ruth both dignity and smarts. One could even argue that she’s the closest of all killers to mentally matching the good Lieutenant, never underestimating him for a moment and giving him no real reason to suspect her.
Thematically she’s similar to two other popular Columbo killers: Lady in Waiting‘s Beth Chadwick, who was also oppressed by her family members; and Any Old Port‘s Adrian Carsini, who shares her single-minded zeal for safeguarding the family business. On paper, it sounds promising.
However, the confrontation between murderer and detective is never permitted to sizzle due to the docile nature of the story and some senseless writing that betrays the Ruth character and ultimately renders the episode a dud. Where it falters most is in the illogical actions Ruth takes in the second half of the episode with regard to Janie. In short, Ruth stitches up the only person she loves – and it makes no sense at all!
Aunt Ruth and niece Janie have a special relationship. Janie even admits early on that she prefers her aunt to her own mother, Phyllis. Reading between the lines later on, we can even infer that Janie is Ruth’s secret daughter – the offspring of the love between Ruth and former fiance Peter Brandt before wretched sister Phyllis stole him away.
“Ruth is arguably the closest of all Columbo killers to mentally matching the good Lieutenant.”
The way I see it, jealous Phyllis couldn’t stand to see her sister finding love, so lured Peter into her foxy lair. Once it was discovered that Ruth was pregnant (scandal alert!), Phyllis and Peter escaped to the country to be out of the public eye and to wed, while Ruth was cooped up at Lytton HQ to see out the pregnancy. Once little Janie was born, she was handed to Phyllis and Peter to raise as their own in order to deny society columnists a scandalous scoop. It’s heartbreaking stuff, and would explain why Ruth has no love for anyone but Janie.
Granted, not all viewers interpret Janie’s lineage this way. It could well be that Phyllis is the biological mother, but there’s enough murkiness to make it pleasingly ambiguous. Still, by Janie’s own admission, Ruth has been the glue that kept the family together, and has been the most protective and supportive of Janie. So why does Ruth attempt to frame Janie for the double murder?
Planting the belt buckle in Janie’s wardrobe was a calculated act to direct suspicion away from herself on to the younger woman. This can only lead to (at best) acute stress and trauma for the poor, innocent lass – and possibly (at worst) life behind bars! This after Ruth already made sure that Janie was the one who discovered the traumatising dead bodies in the museum. That’s some seriously tough love Ruth’s dishing out!
Ruth’s actions are actually more suggestive of hating Janie than loving her. With that in mind, I put forward a tantalising alternative plot that would have had Ruth playing the long-game of revenge against the family that wronged her, and in which Janie is definitely not her daughter.
Hear me out! It’s heavily implied that Ruth killed Peter Brandt years before, hiding her act behind ministrations to a sick man. Edward’s determination to sell the museum was the trigger Ruth needed to finally rid herself of him, and by framing hated niece Janie she could have completed her decades-long mission of revenge, leaving Phyllis to feel the sting of isolation and desperation that Ruth herself had felt years earlier.
This would have given the episode a deliciously hard edge. As it is, the indecision and inconsistency in the script suggests that story writer Peter S. Feibleman (who also starred as victim Milton Schaeffer) didn’t have a full grasp on who Ruth was supposed to be and how she should plausibly act. The framing of Janie is the prime example, but not the only one.
For a quiet, bookish woman, Ruth has ice-cold presence of mind under pressure. Note how casually she gunned down brother Edward moments after dispatching the hapless Schaeffer. She displayed hired hit-man levels of coolness. Given that it’s heavily implied Ruth caused the death of Peter Brandt years earlier and we’re presented with a scheming, inconspicuous and remorseless serial killer, who might be one of the series’ most dangerous criminals if you’re on her wrong side!
“For a quiet, bookish woman, Ruth has ice-cold presence of mind under pressure.”
Does this correlate with the quiet, unassuming woman Ruth is shown as being? It’s certainly a stretch, although serial killers can be entirely unobtrusive when not carrying out heinous crimes. However, the sympathetic treatment Ruth receives from Columbo, and the glowing character references she gets from Janie, clearly signpost that we should feel kindly towards her.
The writing’s to blame for Ruth’s inconsistent characterisation, and much of that is a likely result of Feibleman’s major rewrite to an original story written by Peter S. Fischer – the legendary Columbo writer responsible for classics including Publish or Perish, A Friend in Deed, Negative Reaction and A Deadly State of Mind.
Feibleman, on the other hand, had only one Columbo writing credit to his name – Fade in to Murder, which was co-penned. Entrusting him to rework a master craftsman’s efforts is perhaps a key reason why Old Fashioned Murder is as flawed as it is.
Fischer’s original version (which you can read here – thanks to Rich Weill for drawing my attention to it) was entitled In Deadly Hate and was a riff on Shakespeare’s Richard III. In it, the Bard-quoting Richard Costaine is sidelined from his role as curator at his beloved family museum by business-minded nephew Edward, whom Richard pays a private investigator $100,000 to bump off.
Richard himself then kills the PI at a family residence in the mountains and frames the second nephew for the double homicide. Phyllis (who doesn’t faint once in the draft) is the strong and determined mother of the nephews, but there is no Ruth equivalent.
Reading it, you can see there are a lot of the same beats that made it into the final script, but there are significant differences. For one thing, Columbo is one of two cops investigating separate murders; nephew James is having a clandestine love affair with a Las Vegas showgirl, who ultimately provides his alibi; while the PI is keen to ditch a loveless marriage by faking his own death. There’s also no sub-plot about shady family secrets.
“Casting Van Patten was a good move given the comparative scarcity of female leads in the series.”
Would In Deadly Hate have been a top episode? Unlikely, but it would have been an improvement on how Old Fashioned Murder panned out – not least because Richard wasn’t burdened by any actual affection for his wider family, so behaved consistently throughout. Certainly Fischer was unimpressed by the final result, refusing to be credited as the story writer, instead going by the pseudonym Lawrence Vail.
The one improvement made (in my opinion) was to have a female killer. Burgess Meredith (The Penguin in 60s’ Batman!) was in Fischer’s mind’s eye to play Richard Costaine, and while he could have been a fine villain, having Van Patten play such an atypical killer was a good move given the comparative scarcity of female leads in the series.
I only wish the talented Van Patten had been given a stronger episode to star in. The sad fact is that Columbo fans probably better remember her few minutes of screen time as the comic nun in Negative Reaction than for her leading role here.
The bland nature of Old Fashioned Murder also does few favours for the supporting cast, which, on paper, is outstanding. Like Van Patten, Tim O’Connor is making his second series’ appearance after a fine turn as scheming lawyer Michael Hathaway in season 2’s Double Shock. His role as Edward here is short-lived and one-dimensional.
As Phyllis Brandt-Lytton, Celeste Holm is the script’s biggest casualty. As head of the household and a noted beauty and socialite, her role ought to be an intriguing one. Instead she’s one of the entire series’ most annoying support characters, reduced to performing multiple ‘comedy’ faints and setting back the course of women’s lib by 50 years with her insistence on never leaving a room without being on a man’s arm.
It’s evident she’s supposed to be adding comic relief, but frankly it’s an embarrassing waste of an Oscar-winning actress. If only Ruth had slain Phyllis as well, the audience could have been roaring their approval! Instead, any time Holm is on screen I’m quietly seething at what a weak, shallow, fool she comes across as – although her presence admittedly helps ramp up sympathy for Ruth, who deserves our pity for having such an idiotic sibling if nothing else.
As Janie, Jeannie Berlin is really the best-of-the-rest in the support cast and is the least let-down by the story. She performs well in a decent role that gives her a chance to showcase her range from sweet naivety to icy disdain (notwithstanding her unintentionally hilarious reaction to finding two dead bodies). A Best Supporting Actress Oscar nominee in 1973 for her turn in The Heartbreak Kid, Berlin really can act and she comes out of the episode with credit.
Berlin’s real-life mother, the renowned and ground-breaking director Elaine May, directed Peter Falk and John Cassavetes in acclaimed gangster flick Mikey & Nicky, which was released earlier in 1976. I wouldn’t be surprised if this connection was responsible for Berlin being cast in Old Fashioned Murder. Interestingly, though, she had a 14-year acting hiatus after this episode was filmed. Hopefully her Columbo experience wasn’t the reason!
Elsewhere, Feibleman even lets himself down by his own writing of the Milton Schaeffer character. Accepting that he was saddled with gambling debts and being tracked by hired goons, it’s still one hell of a leap of faith to play along with Ruth’s scheme. Why would he think a bookish spinster would be able to secure him a fake passport? Why make such life-altering decisions in a heartbeat? Act in haste repent at leisure, eh, Milton? It’s hardly plausible and is further evidence of the weak writing.
“Falk’s performance veers, at times, closer to Last Salute to the Commodore than is comfortable.”
The episode doesn’t even go out on a high. Many lesser Columbo outings have been partly redeemed by a memorable gotcha scene. Old Fashioned Murder doesn’t have one. Instead it just peters out.
Columbo can prove Ruth lied about the whereabouts of the gold belt buckle. She quietly gives herself over after he agrees to her request to backtrack on his earlier insinuations that Ruth may have killed Janie’s father. There’s no great revelation or a stunning admission that we should have been building towards. It’s all very flat – although Ruth leaving the room on a man’s arm on her own terms was a nice touch.
The tepid finale points to further uncertainties within the story. I wonder if it was a late decision to try to redeem Ruth by having her save Janie from further pain? I think it would have been vastly more interesting to have Columbo alone foil Ruth’s dastardly long-term revenge plan, saving Janie from a life behind bars but leaving her emotionally crippled, realising she was a mere pawn in a decades-long betrayal game. This could have packed some real emotional punch – something the episode totally lacks.
So how does Peter Falk fare in this ocean of mediocrity? Presumably he had a major role to play in having the episode so thoroughly reworked, although quite how much is unknown. He’s certainly not bad in this, but it’s not a vintage performance.
He seems to be trying to amuse himself throughout with a performance that veers, at times, closer to Last Salute to the Commodore than is comfortable. The exaggerated mannerisms and expressions he adopted there are in evidence, and he’s annoyingly cryptic with sidekick Sergeant Miller when the direct approach would be more appropriate.
Still, he and Van Patten made for an interesting pairing and for once all of Columbo’s obfuscating and sham incompetence doesn’t fool his quarry for a moment. I can only repeat what I said earlier that this confrontation should have been far more gripping than it ultimately was.
Despite many problems, viewers that successfully combat the ennui can still glean shreds of enjoyment. For one thing, the dark and gothic nature of the museum is nicely done and is an apt setting for a tale of murder and betrayal. Dick De Benedictis returns to score his 15th Columbo episode and his spooky, medieval, harpsichord-laden arrangement is a perfect accompaniment.
The skeletons in the Lytton family closet provide a heavy cloak of deception surrounding lost love, revenge and the lineage of Janie, and to the episode’s credit it’s never too heavy-handed in what it reveals about Ruth’s past life. Yes, we can speculate that she killed Peter Brandt and that she’s Janie’s biological mother, but it’s left open to interpretation. I think that’s for the best and Feibleman deserves some props for that, if it was done deliberately.
The pickings are too slim to get excited about, however, and Old Fashioned Murder is mirthless and unremarkable when compared to pretty much every episode that’s come before it. Aside from Columbo’s haircut, the humour is lowest-common-denominator stuff, so there’s very little to help it stand tall in the memory. Casual fans most likely hardly remember it at all.
To conclude, Old Fashioned Murder is not a terrible piece of television in the grand scheme of things, but by Columbo standards it’s a disappointment. With Falk such a stickler for quality scripts, it’s also something of an anomaly. The series’ lead man scaled back his commitment to Columbo to concentrate on his movie career in 1976, but spoke of his intent to place quality above quantity in the few episodes he would appear in.
Slow and unexciting, at times a confused mess, and with a central villain who’s only partially realised, Old Fashioned Murder blows Falk’s ambitions out of the water. For a season featuring only three episodes, actors and viewers alike had a right to have expected much better than this.
How I rate ’em
For all of Joyce Van Patten’s quiet dignity, Old Fashioned Murder is too flawed to earn a recommendation. It’s poorly plotted, it’s dull, it’s hugely forgettable and is deservedly one of the least regarded episodes of the classic era. While I don’t hate it, I’m certainly in no hurry to view it again.
Feel the need to revisit previous episode reviews? Then click on any link below and saddle up!
- Suitable for Framing
- Publish or Perish
- Double Shock
- Murder by the Book
- Negative Reaction
- A Friend in Deed
- Death Lends a Hand
- A Stitch in Crime
- Now You See Him
- Double Exposure
- Lady in Waiting
- Troubled Waters
- Any Old Port in a Storm
- Prescription: Murder
- A Deadly State of Mind —B-List starts here—
- An Exercise in Fatality
- Identity Crisis
- Swan Song
- The Most Crucial Game
- Etude in Black
- By Dawn’s Early Light
- Candidate for Crime
- Greenhouse Jungle
- Playback
- Forgotten Lady
- Requiem for a Falling Star
- Blueprint for Murder
- Fade in to Murder
- Ransom for a Dead Man
- A Case of Immunity
- Dead Weight —–C-List starts here——
- The Most Dangerous Match
- Lovely but Lethal
- Short Fuse ———D-List starts here—-
- A Matter of Honor
- Mind Over Mayhem
- Old Fashioned Murder
- Dagger of the Mind
- Last Salute to the Commodore —Z-List starts here—
That’s it for now, dear readers. As always I want to hear your views on this episode. Have you read the script for the original incarnation of this story? If so, let me know if you think it would have been a better bet, or where Old Fashioned Murder went wrong. And do you share my opinion that Janie was actually Ruth’s daughter?
After a somewhat lacklustre pair of episodes, can season 6 round out on a high with the preposterously titled The Bye-Bye Sky High IQ Murder Case? Viewers of the day would have to wait 6 months for their next Columbo hit to find out. You won’t have to, so check back in again soon!
Contribute to this site’s upkeep from just $3
Dozens of Columbo gift ideas right here
Buy the US Columbo DVD boxset here
Buy the UK Columbo DVD box set here
Also, while the last bit of Ruth requesting Columbo’s arm was tasty at first blush, a bitter aftertaste hit me when I realized how the script clumsily drove home the punchline’s setup with Phyllis making that inane comment 3 times in, what, 2 days. C’mon, has she really dropped this bon mot in every conversation she’s had for the last 50 years? Ham-fisted to say the least.
The Phyllis character is just such a wet blanket thrown over the whole episode. Her obnoxiousness even manages to spoil the gotcha aftermath.
Watched old fashioned murderl ast sunday , definetley not one to
Trouble the top half of the seventies ,quite the reverse for me it starts okay and fairly interesting but really declines in the middle and why does columbo drink imaginary tea from a cup its blatantly empty and how his hair grows back to its original length so quick after his haircut¿
2 bloopers to add insult to injury plus being totally dull overall , not one of the best seventies.
It is messy. Just the fact that half of this site’s commenters view Ruth as a sympathetic figure who’s been tormented by her family for decades and the other half see her as a cold-blooded psychopath willing to slay any soul she perceives has wronged her is indicative of the tonal inconsistency. I mean, the security guard hasn’t hurt a fly (at least since being released from prison) — a gambling problem alone is largely victimless — yet Ruth guns him down without a second thought. And how really has her brother “harmed” her? Sure he disagrees with how the family fortune/museum should be appropriated/managed, but that is hardly out of turn for someone who owns one-third of it. Nor has he lazily forced Ruth to toil at the museum her whole life to keep him rich. We see that he has invested no shortage of personal effort in shoring up the museum’s bottom line over the years and is even working until 3 a.m. on a Friday night to finish inventory. She loves the museum, he doesn’t. So she guns him down? Yikes.
That said, I understand why viewers may have a softer reaction to Ruth, as every other scene (and Columbo) hint at her being a long-suffering victim of vague abuse. One could argue that all the uncertainty lends complexity to the proceedings, but I side with CP that the house of cards falls apart with the framing of the niece and that the story would have worked better if the script/direction had instead leaned fully into a long-play vengeance angle against sister and niece.
Speaking of which, it certainly FEELS like the dialogue/actors want us to think Janie may be Ruth’s daughter, but that plot point doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. If the goal was to avoid scandal and Peter had knocked up Ruth, his fiance, it would make far more sense for him to marry her, even if he had been fiddling around with Phyllis on the side. The only reason for a quickie marriage between Peter and Phyllis — and for Ruth to stand down — would be if he knocked Phyllis up while cheating on Ruth. You could conceive a situation wherein Ruth was pregnant but Phyllis and Peter were so much in love that the family opted for the baby switch plan, except that it is made clear Phyllis didn’t have strong feelings for Peter and such a ruse would require hiding both Ruth and Phyllis away from society for 6 months. Not exactly the most effective way to avoid public scandal.
Once you accept that Janie is not only Phyllis’ daughter but also the nail in the coffin of Ruth’s relationship with Peter, the stage is perfectly set for a slow burn revenge plot where Ruth attempts to inflict the most amount of pain possible on all 3 (and possibly her brother as well if they had made him more of a bastard).
Feibleman clearly got lost in the weeds.
This episode is a mess and the Lytton museum strikes me as ridiculous. The only successful private museums that I see are niche collections in tourist trap locations. The Lytton museum has a few rooms with a random artifacts from all over European history. It doesn’t even have a parking lot. Much larger public museums rely heavily on donations and tax dollars to supplement their attendance revenue. Has anybody seen such a private ventures like the Lytton museum anywhere in the U.S.?
Well, Columbo’s hair is frequently helter skelter – help! – but he’s had a hard day’s night so we should probably just come together and let it be.
Hi Columbophile,
It struck me while watching Old Fashioned Murder that actress Jeannie Berlin ( Janie) bore a remarkable resemblance to actress Talia Shire, on her role as Sylvester Stallone’s girlfriend -then-wife Adrienne in all of the “Rocky” movies.
I thank you for your thoughtful and clear review of “Old Fashioned Murder » because I found several scenes extremely confusing, and your review – and other commenters – filled in the blanks for me. I really like Joyce Van Payton’s acting in this episode, and agree that the plot’s many weaknesses did her a grave disservice. I never picked up on the notion that Ruth could have been Janie’s biological mom, but this makes a lot of sense. All in all, I kept hoping that the conclusion and “gotcha” moment would salvage a case that what was, for me anyways, interesting, but rather dull and a bit confusing. Unfortunately, I thought the finale was really a letdown. I’d place this episode near the bottom of my rankings (but it still rates higher than the ridiculous “Commodore” episode in my rankings).
I’m surprised no one else mentioned the resemblance
between Janie here, and Shirley, David Lang’s secretary
in Lovely but Lethal, played by Sian Barbara Allen.
Interesting. I thought from her personality and behavior that Ruth was a bonafide sociopath, among the up to 10% posited to live among us in otherwise ordinary lives. She certainly shows little to no capacity for guilt or conscience.
In terms of Janie, framing her actually might be a brilliant move. Since Janie’s innocent, any case against could fall apart in court, even if circumstantially there appears to be evidence. If she’s tried and found innocent, double jeopardy kicks in. At the same time, suspicion is thrown off Ruth. If that was her plan, she would only put Janie through some temporary distress while Ruth eventually could walk away free.
At any rate, enjoy your thoughtful and entertaining reviews.
I think that the similarities with Negative Reaction
are fairly deliberate. JVP in both, with Ruth Lytton
as the new Paul Galesko who will kill an uninvolved
victim along with their intended victim to help hide
their tracks.
In short, true psychopaths, both functioning normally
until someone gets in their way, or they want something.
Just watched it last night. I am easily bored and some episodes are too slow and drawn out for me but this one, I didn’t mind. I think it’s because I found Joyce Van Patten’s “Ruth” character so well played.
She was the female version of Joe Cool.
Learning near the end that she likely killed before after watching her earlier kill not one, but two people was an eye opener. I thought the end where she willingly leaves with Columbo (I guess all killers do) just so she could continue hiding secrets (she didn’t give a damn about Janie) was on brand as it was more selfishness than compassion. She just wanted to protect her ego and not look terrible in front of Janie.
And hey, the line about walking out on Columbo’s arm, a great loop from an earlier line in the episode. I found the storytelling less shaky than MANY other episodes.
Now, the constant fainting, lol, yeah that was overly dramatic and over the top.
As a man, Janie in jail, barefoot too, well…swoon.
This one is indeed one of the lesser entries in the series. I have no problems with the setup, The fact that it’s about an old maid, doesn’t bother me at all. Indeed the only memorable aspect of the film is van Patten’s fine character-painting. She is a revengeful murderess but also a tragic figure who can’t get over the various injustices the family inflict on her. The gotcha moment is really memorable, it is impossible not to feel for her, despite the callous murders she committed. (Falk however delivers his worst performance here. His grimaces are very strange, and he hardly opens his mouth, at one point he seems to have dubbed himself.)
The real problem with this episode though are the many plot holes.
After Schaeffer fired the gun close to the receiver, he does sound as a victim of a surprise attack, and not like someone involved in a fight, and there’s no second shot that could have killed Ruth’s brother. But Columbo does not address this crucial issue.
Columbo states that nothing has been touched in the room where the bodies were found, but the bodies were discovered by Ruth’s niece, and the two women could change on the scene anything they wanted. It is no surprise there’s a sudden cut after Janie’s iconic fist-bite.
When the police finds the buckle planted by Ruth in Janie’s wardrobe, they arrest her. But Janie does not protest despite being innocent and does not even thinks about who might have wanted to frame her. Her arrest is questionable anyway, because the police did not even show her the piece of evidence her arrest was based on. What did they say her? “You are arrested, because we have found something in your room.”?
Not only doesn’t Janie protest her arrest, she doesn’t even notice it! When Miller says her name, she’s looking at her mom the entire time. Doesn’t even react! Very strange directing.
Along these lines, the brother was recording his inventory when he heard the guard being shot downstairs. Either the shot would be on the recording making it clear that it wasn’t a confrontation. Or, the writer should have given us some logic as to why not.
And the light being out – was a hint that could be dismissed. It was treated as totally definitive that there was a 3rd person. It makes sense a thief would be in the dark. The brother could have walked in from a lit hallway. So there would have been enough light. The brother would be shooting into the dark but that could be attributed to panic if the first shot or reaction if the second shot.
So I think your comment about the phone call would be the thing to create suspicion. The recording would be the clincher (for the shot and the buckle).
Since I’m commenting – I think Janey is annoying. She seems like a sheltered 12 year old most of the time including the sailor dress. But then she’s having an affair with a married man and isn’t freaked out at all about being in jail.
The tape recording is indeed problematic. There should be several hours of tape that would destroy the attempt to place the murder at 9 p.m.
Janie is beyond annoying.
The lack of a second shot on the recorded call
is indeed a flaw in Ruth’s plan. Why she would rely
on the deficient recording to give herself an alibi
is unexplained. To Columbo though, it means it’s
not a recording of the exchange of fire in the
museum.
I think it’s fair to say that no one entering a room
would turn the lights off. Nor would Janie do so
after fleeing the room of bodies in panic. Or touch
anything in it afterwards after being instructed by
police.
I take that back. The Sergeant explains the one shot
on the recording as the two guns going off at the same
time. But that is SO UNLIKELY. Columbo doesn’t comment
on it, and concludes later that the call was staged.
Very interesting points about the original script! I always assumed that Ruth intended to take out her fury on everyone surrounding her sister (her ex, her brother, her sister’s daughter) and forced herself to go forward with her plan but then faltered because she truly (against her will) loves Janie.
But I agree that the script gets confused regarding motive. The ending always throws me a bit.
Love the website!
I hadn’t watched this one in a while, and remembered this review, so I had low expectations. I actually enjoyed it a lot more than I thought I would! It’s not perfect, and the missing powder marks on the victim’s hands bugged me, but otherwise, it has some good moments. I’m surprised no one mentioned when Lady Phyllis tells Columbo she is going to have him “disbarred” or whatever they called it, and he responds the word she wants is “fired”. Then she calls him “Columbus”. Made me laugh!
Another good moment is when Columbo rear ends the
police car. Officer: “That’s OK sir, you got the dent”
In the In Deadly Hate version it is a different police officer who arrests the Ruth-equivalent character. That makes more sense, since Columbo clearly does not believe Ruth is guilty.
The odd thing is this is the only Columbo episode i never understood. All the other ones are easy to understand. I recently saw this episode again on TV, which led me here, so…..long live Columbo! I’ll be watching him til the day i die..My favorite episode is called, “Playback”. “Suitable For Framing”, with Ross Martin is also one of my favorites.
I have a question about this episode if there are any Columbo experts here. Since Aunt Ruth loved Janie and always protected her, why did she try to frame Janie by hiding he belt buckle in her closet? I mean, did she love her or didn’t she? I have watched Columbo all my life and i never could figure out the answer to that question.
Ruth’s motive for framing Janie is a black hole at the heart of the episode. It makes no sense at all.
I think it can be explained, altough I don’t know whether it’s the right explanation.
Loving people sometimes want the loved one to be dependent of them. And Janie is getting independent from her aunt. She’s getting older, and she has a relation with Dr Tim Schaeffer.
If the museum is sold, Ruth will loose the place and the reason where and why she is together with Janie every day.
Getting Janie imprisoned is a very hard but sure way to maintain and even strengthen her dependency towards her aunt.
Remind also that Ruth wanted Janie to discover the 2 dead bodies, including the one of her uncle. So we can’t say “Ruth always protected Janie”. She protected her against her mother: that’s the jealousy between the two sisters.
Ruth’s love for Janie must be a (very) possessive one.
Thank you for your answer. That is the best answer I’ve heard yet. I sure couldn’t figure it out and i’ve wondered for decades why Ruth did this to Janie.
I think this interpretation is giving too much credit to writer Peter Fiebelman! I think he completely failed to have a solid grasp on the central characters (especially Ruth) and therefore any conclusions the viewer can reach about Ruth’s actions and motivations won’t be backed up by the script. Fiebelman only had 5 or so writing credits in his career, and only one after Old Fashioned Murder. Interesting to note that Peter S Fischer, who wrote the original screenplay for this, has disowned the story completely after Fiebelman’s major reworking.
I think that Ruth’s character, both as
acted and written, is consistent with
everything else in the story. Sociopaths
like her rarely betray their intentions
and thought processes through facial expressions and words. Often making
their actions appear unexplained and
contradictory. It’s not for no reason that
the producers chose DVD and JVP for
these roles, so cast against their usual
type.
Nor do I think the murky Lytton family
history is overly relevant. Columbo
uncovers what he can to break the case,
For instance, whether Janie believed
Ruth was her actual mother. No. Hence
no reason not to break the trust between
them, or to assume that Ruth would not
frame Janie.
One of these days, when I have OODLES
OF TIME TO SPARE, I will try to figure out
how Phyllis’s husband really died, or whose kid Janie really is. Probably there’s not enough info to decide what we aren’t meant to know anyway.
I surmised Ruth wanted her freedom to continue
her work for the museum. Her reason for slaying
Edward after all.
Celeste Holm was wasted in this episode. “I’m not made of lace” but the word “homicide” makes her faint? Great actress, silly role–surprised she even accepted it. The writers should have given her character more bite, like Jessie Royce Landis in “Lady in Waiting.”
So far, no other viewer has wondered what has caused
this tendency of Phyllis to faint at the thought of murder.
Indeed, perhaps a history of unexplained deaths surrounding
the family has made her so hypersensitive. Then maybe Ruth
is the cause of much earlier death too. Making Columbo’s
threat of airing all the family’s past at a trial, all that more
potent.
Perhaps this too, is what makes her so willingly go into custody.
Interesting that no one has remarked on what I find to be a rather obvious plot hole, neither victim has powder burns or any other clue showing that they actually fired the guns. It’s not something I would expect to be overlooked, so I chalk it up to poor writing and direction and a troubled production. I like Joyce Van Patten’s character she had good potential but the plot doesn’t use her very well. That’s probably why I don’t find this episode engaging.
I agree that the Darryl character lifts this episode up, Anthony Holland was such a great character actor who could steal scenes so well. It’s a fine comic note that the watch salesman spots the hair stylist’s work. Holland He had a sad ending, taking his own life at age 60 in 1988. He was afflicted by AIDS at a time when it was invariably fatal.
Columbophile, your comment on “the comparative scarcity of female leads in the series” got me to wondering how accurate your perception was, so I did a quick check. Statistics for homicides in the real world show that about 88% of all homicides are committed by men, which of course would mean that the remaining 12% are done by women. In Columbo, there are 69 episodes; in one episode there is no murder, and in several there are two or more victims involved, and/or two or more murderers. But to keep it simple, if 88% of the 69 episodes featured male murderers, that would round off to 61 men. And if 12% of the 69 episodes featured female murderers, that would round off to 8 women. So how does the series compare to reality? In the series, there are thirteen episodes that feature a female lead murderer. That’s close to 19%, as compared to the expected 12%. There are also several episodes in which women are accomplices, and would probably be tried for murder in the real world. I don’t think that the producers of Columbo ever calculated exactly how many women to feature, but I think they did a good job of including a reasonable number of murderous females during the show’s long run.
These are the murderous thirteen: Leslie Williams in Ransom for a Dead Man; Beth Chadwick in Lady in Waiting; Lily Stanhope in Dagger of the Mind; Nora Chandler in Requiem for a Falling Star; Viveca Scott in Lovely but Lethal; Grace Wheeler in Forgotten Lady; Ruth Lytton in Old Fashioned Murder; Abigail Mitchell in Try and Catch Me; Kay Freestone in Make Me a Perfect Murder; Dr. Joan Allenby in Sex and the Married Detective; Vivian Dimitri in Rest in Peace, Mrs. Columbo; Lauren Staton in It’s All in the Game; and Vanessa Galper in Columbo Likes the Night Life.
You might do a Top 10 Lethal Ladies if you wanted! If you’ve already done such a list, I’m sorry that I haven’t gone through all of the Archives yet, as I’ve only recently discovered your wonderful blog. You might also take more time than I did, and come up with a more accurate body count for the men versus the women.
Victoria,
I don’t think Columbophile, talking about “the comparative scarcity of female leads in the series”, was considering the (small) proportion of female murderers in real life. In the Columbo-series, the almost only way for an actor to show his acting capacities is to be the murderer. There are very view exceptions to that. (Jeanette Nolan in Double Shock is one.) In this series, Robert Culp and Jack Cassidy have had three opportunities to show their immense acting talents. As a murderer. Patrick McGoohan has had several too. Not any actress, whatever talent she has, has had that chance. That’s why we can speak about the comparative scarcity of female leads in this series. And that’s why it’s a pitty.
Incidentally, I’d like to notice that most of the killings in the Columbo-series are very cleverly planned murders, executed by very smart people. The exceptions are very rare, and even the killings that weren’t cleverly planned are hidden by clever strategies, made to cheat the police.
I don’t think the killings you’re taliking about, of which 88% are committed by men, all are that cleverly planned. I even think a lot of them are bold, stupid, and easily solved by the police.
Maybe the average female killer is more clever and has a better plan than the average male killer, what makes them good examples for an episode with Columbo. Maybe not 12, but 20% of the clever killings are committed by women, … and 99% of the stupid and clumsy ones by men.
I think that Peter Fischer must have been a George S Kaufman fan: his pseudonym “Lawrence Vail” is the name of a supporting character in Kaufman and Hart’s 1930 Hollywood satire, ONCE IN A LIFETIME. Vail is a New York writer who’s completely frustrated by the insanity of the movie studio that hired him (perhaps Mr. Fischer had some fellow feeling). The part must have been near and dear to Kaufman’s heart– he himself played the role during the show’s initial B’way run.
Interesting! Fischer was certainly frustrated by the significant changes made to his story, so that probably explains why he chose to be credited as Vail on this occasion.
Peter Fischer wrote a memoir – Me And Murder, She Wrote” – in which he IDed ‘Lawrence Vail’ as his registered pseudonym, to be applied to any script that turned out badly, in his estimation (‘Mr. Vail’ turns up again as “author” of “Strange Bedfellows”).
Many TV writers had “red-flag” pen names registered with the WGA for this purpose: If in your watching you happen across an episode credited to ‘Ged Leighton’, that’s the red-flag name for William (theodore) link and Richard (Leighton) Levinson.
Just so you know …
Apologies for the misprints (Damn QWERTYUIOP).
That’s “TED Leighton”, using the middle names of William Theodore Link and Richard Leighton Levinson.
Saw it for the first time the other night on MeTV – did not notice that there was a scene cut (the hairdresser).
What DID get my notice – and I still cannot stop thinking about it – is…
WHAT MUSEUM / GALLERY WOULD LET THEIR ITEMS BE USED LIKE THAT?
I don’t care how good your staff is, you are NOT shoving a jeweled necklace like that into a pocket and handling it without gloves, and FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT’S HOLY, a buckle that’s got to be worth six figures (’70s dollars) for the gold content ALONE is NOT GOING TO BE LET OUT OF THE EVIDENCE LOCKER TO BE USED AS AN ASHTRAY!
This will be tonight’s episode on MeTV. Thanks to the pandemic, I’ll be watching it with my friends via Zoom, they from the DVD at their place, and me from my PVR’s recording of the MeTV broadcast. Whenever there’s a scene missing from the TV version, I pause my copy to let them catch up.
I hope MeTV doesn’t cut the hair salon scene, but I know that they do cut scenes to fit more ads in (which should be against the law) so I’m bracing myself in advance for that possibility. It’s going to be a much dryer episode without that scene.
The first time I saw the episode, I was very impressed that Columbo *actually got a different hairstyle*. Usually TV shows never actually depict any change in hairstyle; they do a cheap cop-out where they just have the hairstylist hold scissors and make vague clipping motions behind the character’s head. The person looks exactly the same afterwards.
The only thing that would have been better is if (a) Columbo had actually gotten a shorter haircut or (b) if his hair *had* to stay the same length for ease of continuity, that it had then been set in a more flattering style, like a pompadour. The neatly-combed, downward-brushed “mop” looks terrible on him. And Columbo is a handsome guy, so it goes to show how bad the hairstyle is that it can make him look bad! So I’m glad he didn’t keep the new ’do for the rest of the episode. 🙂
I bet they do cut that scene, which will be a real shame. It’s such a funny moment – the highlight of the episode by a mile.
Cut!
It’s yet another argument for owning the DVDs. The networks can’t be trusted not to butcher classic scenes.
Yes, my wife and i just watched it on MeTV and the haircut scene was removed….how lame…Agree CP that’s why i have the entire series on DVD!
Yes, I’ve seen this episode with the haircut scene cut. But they keep the watch store scene. It’s jarring because Columbo has the moptop haircut for one scene but they’ve removed the explanation for why.
They cut the body emerging behind the revolving door scene from dead weight on 5 USA twice in the last 2 weeks , one of the better scenes from a less memorable episode shame
Wow, this is a weird episode but I liked it nonetheless. Weird because the rather odd scenes here felt so deliberate,so thought-through, like Columbo’s new hairdo, the sister that fainted on more that one occasion and the maid that dropped the vase at the sight if the lieutenant. So unlike the Commadore episode that had a few flaws that easily could have been corrected. I liked all the actors in this eipsode, especially Joyce but the story is (again) weird. Ruth shooting to death 2 people without batting an eyelid and then trying to frame her niece without much emotions. Really! What were the Columbo team thinking?
How about the eerie scene where Columbo is standing
in the museum, believing he is alone and thinking deeply
about something, but then s-l-o-w-l-y realizes that RUTH
HAS BEEN STANDING RIGHT BEHIND HIM THE WHOLE
TIME!
Thus giving him a first inkling of her true nature.
Columbophile, I enjoyed your review.
However, I have to admit that I really like this episode, perhaps based on the performances of Joyce Van Patton and Peter Falk. She was oddly sympathetic, even though she killed her brother, the security guard, and possibly her ex-boyfriend. I think she carried a lot of resentment for her family because of her fiance stolen by her flighty sister, and other reasons we don’t know about. Thus, the museum became her entire reason for living. When her brother was going to close the museum down, she killed him to keep her reason for living going.
She did frame her niece, but I think at the end, she discovered she actually cared for her niece and surrendered so that her niece wouldn’t think poorly of her after all.
While she put her plan together for the murder pretty quickly, she was pretty sloppy. Don’t turn off the lights, woman! Framing the niece with an artifact that was there while her brother was doing inventory and during the time the police were photographing everything was pretty sloppy as well.
Still, I enjoyed this episode and would rank it somewhere in C or even B list range.
“she killed him to keep her reason for living going”
I think this strikes very close to Ruth’s motive, if not
it exactly.
“surrendered so that her niece wouldn’t think poorly
of her after all.”
I would think that’s part of it. The other part is a bargain
with Columbo to recant his lie that Ruth killed her father.
The scene in the salon is always edited out whenever I’ve seen this episode broadcast. When you see it on American TV, Columbo suddenly has this new hair style. It’s all very confusing.
That really would be confusing! How silly to remove it…
I have noticed that, when I watch these shows on COZI-TV, they atr trimmed to within an inch of their proverbial lives. Every nanosecond deemed superfluous is cut. On Murder She Wrote, you can see how the cast credits are partially cut out, leaving credited cast members’ credits on the editing room floor, so to speak, to use an old saying.
Very low ranking seventies episode in my opinion , very forgettable in my opinion , Dead weight , mind over mayhem , Murder under glass and requiem for a falling star only slightly better episodes but they are in the bottom club of the seventies.
It got very mixed reviews. Not the acting but the storyline treatment — by the well-meaning but not particularly qualified actor Peter S. Feibleman, who played the ill-fated security guard.
I know it’s a bit late to weigh in, but as far as the identify of Janie’s mother is concerned, the vague hints that Ruth might be her real mother irritated me rather than otherwise. Doubts about the paternity of a child has fueled many dramatic conflicts, but doubts about the identity of someone’s mother are much more difficult to pull off — the device rings a bit hollow even in Henry James’s Portrait of a Lady, let alone in this uninspired script.
I think it’s perfectly understandable that Ruth, underneath a facade of affection, actively resents and dislikes her niece as a walking reminder of her failed romance. Ruth, it seems to me, is a character rather like Balzac’s Cousine Bette:
that is, while putting on a long-life act of being the angel in the house, she secretly loathes her entire family and is delighted to contrive her relatives’ downfall. This would explain why she has no hesitation in framing Janie for the murders, but the hints that Janie is her own daughter and the sole emotional outlet in her life make Ruth’s behavior seem very inconsistent.
Then, too, Columbo’s reasoning for dismissing Janie as a suspect is questionable, to say the least. During the interview with Columbo she uses the stolen belt buckle as an ashtray; therefore, the Lieutenant concludes, she has no idea of its value. If Janie were in fact the murderer, what is to stop her from recognizing the buckle on the spot and feigning ignorance by treating it as an ordinary ashtray? If she is able to plot an elaborate double murder, she should be conniving enough to divert suspicion when an important clue is thrust under her nose.
I’m bound to say I’m a bit puzzled by the accolades bestowed on Jeannie Berlin’s performance. She seemed to me to be phoning it in. Indeed, this episode has one of the weakest supporting casts in the entire series. Celeste Holm’s supposedly comic faints were simply an embarrassment. Peter Feibleman’s acting skills are on a par with his screenwriting. Even the actress who played the nervous maid was stagy and unconvincing. Anthony Holland’s cameo as Darryl was certainly entertaining but it could not, on its own, redeem an entire episode.
It’s a shame, because Joyce Van Patten is a splendid actress and she turned in a wonderful performance. As Columbophile points out, she is one of the few suspects who is not fooled for a moment by the good Lieutenant’s obfuscations. One of the few weaknesses of the series as a whole is that several of the murderers seem to have surprisingly little sense of self-preservation. Few of them appear to be aware that when a detective makes it clear that you’re a prime suspect, the best course of action is to sit on your hands and refrain from compromising yourself further. Ruth is much more canny than the majority of the murderers. She carefully monitors the Lieutenant’s maneuvers before making her next move. She could have proved to be a worthy opponent, every bit as cunning as the Lieutenant himself, which would have made for some delicious confrontations between the two. But the confrontations rarely materialize, and the characterization is unraveled by the weak writing and the sub-par performances of nearly everyone else in the cast.
An Old-Fashioned Murder is not a fiasco on the level of Last Salute to the Commodore, but it’s sadly marred by the inconsistencies in characterization of the antagonist and the cartoon-like behavior of all of the others. It makes for disappointing viewing.
I too at first believed that Ruth loved Janie, but later on I realized that Ruth was an angry, bitter, resentful woman who played the long game. As Janie says, “Detective Columbo says that you hate us” – I believe she hated everyone and her heart was closed. The museum was all she had.
I actually like this episode because I love the fact that, so cost-conscious, she turns the lights off after the murder, a major mistake, but also part of her personality.
I think this was just another lie to get Janie to confirm
she had nothing to do with the murders. Columbo
has no reason to think Ruth hates them all, including
Janie.
But he does have reason to believe that she loves
working at the museum above all, where she spent
so much of her childhood, and so many years as an
adult.
COLUMBOPHILE::
“That’s some serious tough love Ruth’s dishing out.” — SO FUNNY.
I ENJOYED THE SNARKY COMMENTS THROUGHOUT BUT THAT ONE LINE HAD ME LAUGHING HYSTERICALLY. THANKS!!
My pleasure, sir, nice to know folk are enjoying my humble efforts!
I’m glad you mentioned the sailor dress! Myrna Loy rocks the look much better in Etude in Black.
I think Columbo looks like Davy Jones in the haircut pic! I have to wonder why a society girl like Janie looks so at home in jail…
Agreed — except that Janie Brandt is not “a society girl” by any stretch of the imagination. Her mother, Phyllis, is a socialite but not wealthy enough to ensure that lifestyle for Janie, who has no interest in it anyway. Janie works in the family business, dates blue collar (and possibly even lower than that, economically) guys, is not beautiful (or even conventionally pretty) and has a very fixed income. Not a “society girl”.
totally agree! She’s low rent.
Things I like about this episode: Joyce van Patten plays a down-to-earth lead, and finally a good female lead in Columbo! I like her better than the women playing out-dated stars.
I found it funny that the other three women in the house reacted to Columbo by either fainting, dropping dishes, or mentioning their love life, making him uncomfortable and gravitating back to JVP.
I think Janie was hot! She’s very direct, and I loved her voice.
She was dating a doctor.
But I guess he was married and she was his dirty little secret….
No, she was dating an ex-con turned security guard.
Maybe I am “misremembering” (as Roger Clements put it) but I do not remember any doctor. If Janie had been seeing a doctor, her parvenue mother would have immediately swooped down and invited him to dinner to vet him and chat him up and hold him as the ideal man Janie should marry, no?
No, the con was the dr’s brother.
Dr. Tim Shaeffer in the credits.
The Doctor was married. That why she didn’t bring him home.
Yes, she was dating a doctor but he was married so it was all in secret. The doc’s brother was the secure guard and that’s how he got the job, because Janie was dating good married brother.
I also liked this episode. Not a favourite but pretty good. Of course I loved the haircut scene and how right away he fixed his hair back to normal. Also Elaine May was a friend of Peter Falk. They were in the movie LUV 1967 together , and Jeannie Berlin and Elaine were in the film In the Spirit with Peter Falk. Joyce Van Patten who was married to Mac (Dennis Dugan) was also in Mikey and Nicky.
Also I thought Celeste Holm was funny in the episode . Very good actors
There is a good cast in this as is normally the case with seventies episiode but the writing in this leaves it down and it just plods to much , has little humor and has a Rather flat ending , Short fuse also had a wasted cast and a messy plot but id rather it any day than OFM , this along with dead weight, matter of honor and murder under glass are in my 10 least favorite of the seventies run .
The Bye – Bye sky High IQ murder is next up to be reviewed , Trust me it is a much much more enjoyable episode than OFM .
I can’t help wondering if our first look at the Lytton estate at the 20 minute mark is exactly the same as stately Wayne Manor on BATMAN! Curiously, another episode I like more than most, few actual duds from the 70s.
I happen to love this episode, it’s a top Columbo fav of mine, and I love the in-depth review provided above! Yes, Fiebleman’s writing may be feeble man (very good!) but, talk about murky storylines: how about that Dick DeBenedictis score, huh? It’s perhaps one of the best, if not the best, music to accompany the killer and episode (other fav scores include Adrian Carsini, Bart Kepple, Abagail Mitchell and Kay Freestone). Music score is huge, it makes the episode…this score framed cold, stodgy Ruth Lytton and her dank family museum perfectly, starting from the F minor-chorded piano intro. I love DeBenedictis’ symphony of unsetted high piano notes and bars simulating Ruth’s lone footsteps through the cavernous museum, it adds mystery to the story. I agree that the biggest inconsistency here is how Ruth could manage to frame Janie (the only one she cares about in the family) for the murders. Deserving of adoration are the Chamomile tea plot, and the portrait of a young Ruth on the wall (that element would return seasons later as Victoria from Butterfly in Shades Of Gray).
You can tell the distinguished JVP gave it her all in this one as one of her finest performances ever. It’s as if she was trying to be a “baddie” version of Jessica Fletcher, nearly ten years before Fletcher’s time. Fiebleman’s Milton Schafer character is cartoonish and laughably pathetic, I love how he plays off that he’s not dumb during Ruth’s proposition to save face, and eventually just goes for the scheme. Tim O’Connor’s “Uncle Edward” and his million-dollar voice are simply priceless. Straight-laced Sergeant Miller adds comic relief to the dank, tense and dreary tone of the main characters and museum. Janie plays out as a very naive and childlike character. Phyllis has the best line in the episode (“I am not without certain influence, LIEUTENANT COLUMBUS!”). Yes the third act and final scene fall short, but this is still a fantastic, and perhaps the most drearily-set Columbo episode.
I kind of loved the last bit: Lieutenant, may I take your arm? Kind of like Blanche Dubois heading for the asylum.
Good for you Greg. For one, I share your appreciation of the importance of musical accompaniment. Second, I’m watching “Old Fashioned Murder” now and agree that Joyce VP gives a great performance; enabling me to feel her pain through what might have appeared to be simply the persona of a cold blooded murderess. She is exceptional. Certainly comparable to the way Donald Pleasance carries “Any Old Port….” I believe Columbophile is a genius; however, I hope he could rewatch; possibly reconsider and bump this up some slots in the overall list. Perhaps when he has the time, after completing the reviews we’re all waiting for. That said, I haven’t yet read his review of this episode. But he can’t change my mind about JVP.
I agree that JVP is excellent in this, but is let down by the inconsistent writing of her character and the tedious nature of the story in general.
This exchange:
Columbo: The coroner’s report on your father said that his condition was bad, and that he had other minor complications. Not big ones. Little ones that the doctor knew about, and your Aunt Ruth knew about because she was nursing him. He had asthma, he was susceptible to infection, it’s why he had a bad cold the week that he died.
Janie: So what?
Columbo: So she probably gave him a lot of chamomile tea.
.. reminded me of this famous exchange:
Lady Nancy Astor: Winston, if you were my husband, I’d poison your tea.
Churchill: Nancy, if I were your husband, I’d drink it.
I don’t disagree with your overall assessment, but I would put it a few slots up on the list- not even Phyllis’ fainting spells are as annoying as is the character of Little Stevie Spellberg, Boy Genius, in Mind Over Mayhem. Only the endless parade of English stereotypes in Dagger of the Mind can really compete with Little Stevie for annoyingness. A Matter of Honor is as dull and forgettable, and Ricardo Montalban’s wooden performance, coupled with the embarrassingly stereotypical depiction of Mexico, also pulls that one below Old Fashioned Murder.
yes I would put a matter of honor lower than this Old fashioned murder starts off okay and has some good clues but gets very un- interesting half way through and is very dreary and falls flat on its feet There are some new ones i would choose over this , death hits the jackpot , agenda for murder , goes to college , murder smoke and shadows , Caution with George Hamilton and murder of a rock star .
I remember when this came on and my brother and I wondering how long Columbo’s haircut would last. But that’s all we remember of note.
Hi columbophile good to see the review finally out . Running out of time at the moment so I will just say Glad to see it ranked where it is with only Dagger and last salute below it .
I dont hate this episode either but its just far too dull and boring and un funny to enjoy it ,thats what other readers should take into account , Fade in to murder wasn’t great but 3 time more colorful than this , Mind over mayhem dull but still edges this one and the dreary dead weight a long way back in season 1 slightly better writing and also edges this sludge , just not one to treasure No pun intended , co incidentally it was on last Sunday On 5 USA and I didnt interrupt my afternoon to watch it .
The Bye – Bye Sky high IQ murder review up next , one of the best and in my own top 5 and galaxies better than this one we look forward .
I don’t have much to add to everyone’s excellent comments, but one thing that has always bugged me abut this episode is Columbo’s haircut–ever notice how, after the scene in the jeweler’s shop, he’s shaggy again? The new hairstyle simply goes away. Don’t know if the scenes with the haircut were filmed last, or it was felt that having Peter Falk nicely coiffed for the rest of the episode would be too distracting, but it’s a noticeable lapse in continuity.
While I’m here, I must say I’ve always like Joyce Van Patten in this episode. She makes Ruth Lytton is a tower of repressed rage. Very calm, professional, and accommodating on the ouside, but inside there’s a slow boil, and every couple of years she has to let off steam by dispatching a member of her family. Certainly, Phyllis and Janie would have been next … after a while.
PS – I never thought anything other than Janie being Ruth’s secret daughter. I think it’s subtly hinted at enough throughout for viewers to reach this conclusion.
Again I waited until your review to watch this episode and again you hit the nail on the head. The inconsistency with Ruth really spoils things. They should have made her really wicked (which would have been a load more fun) or really noble and sympathetic. I’d have preferred her to have been taken away by police after revealing her long-term revenge plan to Janie and Phyllis, finishing by saying something along the lines of ‘And I would have got away with it, too, if it wasn’t for this meddling Lieutenant.’ As it is, the ending is so flat that one could forget about it almost entirely. I’d love to know more about the production of this episode, because the end result is such a mess that I cant imagine any of those involved could be really happy with it.
I didn’t like this episode either. The whole setup for the murder was badly flawed. It would have quickly unraveled if a medical examiner had determined the time of death or someone checked the phone records (why weren’t those things done?). Those supposedly valuable museum artifacts all looked cheap and unimpressive to me.
Bunch of faded old artifacts!
I love this episode. I’d say that Ruth is one of the most interesting and evil of all Columbo killers if you just realize she’s two-faced. On the outside she pretends to be the perfect daughter/ aunt/ sister, but inside she’s a mess.
It’s plain that Janie is not her daughter, but her nieces. Her very existence is a constant slap-in-the-face to Ruth, who grieves the loss of the “daughter she might have had” ever time she looks at her. Just the fact that she was dumped for her sister is a well known humiliation she can do nothing about for the sake of appearances.
So she keeps her enemies close, and plans a way to inflict as much pain onto her sister as possible without anyone knowing she is the guilty party.
First she kills Peter Brandt, but since her sister Phylis only married him to spite her there is ultimately little satisfaction in it. So she waits for another opportunity while keeping Janie close so that when she does plunge the knife it will have the most impact.
That opportunity comes when Edward notices items missing from the museum. I don’t think the murder of her brother had anything to do with saving the museum. I’m certain she hates the museum too for taking her youth away (“I was expected to be here then too.”). It’s a commitment she was pressured into taking that cost her time for a family of her own, but Edward’s plan to shut it down provides her the opportunity to kill him and possibly frame Janie if caught. Then she would have a socially suitable excuse to close the museum he was murdered in, and she can watch as Phylis goes through the trail of her daughter, suffering along without realizing Ruth was behind it.
As we see, this doesn’t work out and in the end it is likely who she really is (a triple murderer) will be revealed. She’s done everything in the shadows up to this point to keep up appearances, and Columbo knows it. In order to keep that false image of the dutiful sister she confesses, assuming her family will believe she only did it to protect her niece.
Thanks Suzy, I love this episode as well. It’s funny and clever from start to finish.
Suzy, you’re summation of Ruth seems to hit the bullseye on all the murky plot points, great job!
I agree, for me the episode is made by the malignant character of Ruth.
I must agree that this is a fine episode.
In my opinion, I think Janie is not the daughter of Ruth. I think Ruth sees Janie as what could’ve been. Ruth tells columbo what happened with Peter, her sister and her. She says she could’ve been hers but her sister stole her lover. She probably loves her niece but may also hold resentment towards her as well. Ruth sees what she missed and perhaps hates Janie for it. Is it rational? Perhaps not but we never really know what they’re really thinking. We pretty much know that Ruth killed Peter for revenge. She hated him, probably wanted to get rid of and frame Janie and maybe was going to off the sister too. Who knows? Maybe she wanted to make her sister feel how she’s felt all these years. Alone and miserable. So no I don’t think Janie was Ruth’s daughter.
Sad to say, I only saw this episode for the first time this year on Vision TV in Canada, and they had cut out the entire barber scene… so I missed the one highlight of the episode.
A reminder that the best way to watch Columbo is on DVD, not on television, as the editors cut out critical scenes so they can fit in all their tv advertisements.
I found this episode dull and boring and have no reason to view it again, unlike episodes such as Troubled Waters, By Dawn’s Early Light, Now You See Him, Negative Reaction, Agenda for Murder, etc which I enjoy watching over and over (and over!).
Shockingly, I would even prefer Murder in Malibu!!! Andrew Steven’s acting is such a bad joke it is unintentionally humourous to watch the train wreck, and not dull and boring like Old Fashioned Murder (anyone want a trunk full of flowers??! LOL).
Despite Joyce Van Patten’s valiant effort, this episode is rather boring, dramatically being somewhat ineffective. Celeste Holm’s character is pure dreck.
As of today, the bottom four entries in Columbophile’s ranking match my own ratings.
Let me get this straight. Ruth ultimately agrees to except the blame for this double murder because a trial would unearth old secrets painful to Janie? After all, that’s apparently the principal reason she surrenders to Columbo. Not because of the belt buckle, but in order for Columbo to retract his theory about how Peter died; in order to avoid a trial in which her past crime is likely to be revealed. So she surrenders to spare pain — to the very person she just tried to frame for the two new murders!? Figure that one out.
At least when Dr. Cahill confessed to protect his son in “Mind over Mayhem,” it was consistent with the rest of the story.
My only quarrel with this review is rating “Old Fashioned Murder” above “Dagger of the Mind” and “Last Salute to the Commodore.” DOTM and LSTTC have redeeming features. DOTM is a quaint homage to the classic British mystery. LSTTC provides a clever reversal of the Columbo formula. OFM has nothing to recommend it. It was filmed, I believe, because a two-episode season wouldn’t fly, and time ran out trying to find a way to fix Peter Fischer’s original script (which every Columbo devotee should read). Even Joyce Van Patten’s performance doesn’t help the episode, because you can’t make a star turn out of a senseless character.
A well written script and a fairly good plot is diminished by the sheer dullness of this episode. While i respect this episode i rarely watch it because it fails to entertain.
I love reading your reviews. They are spot on. The fact you rate Suitable for Framing as the #1 Columbo episodes puzzles me though. That episode does not stand out to me as memorable.
Suitable for Framing has the best-ever Columbo gotcha; a memorable early kill; a wonderfully slimy baddie in Ross Martin; a many-levelled murder and framing plot; several terrifically funny scenes (Dale at the art show, nude model, Columbo meets the busybody landlady); an awesome musical score; plus roles for Kim Hunter and Don Ameche. There’s nothing not to like in my opinion!
I agree columbophile but myself at this stage of reviews would have Negative reaction and swan song ahead of suitable for framing as I think negatives gotcha is very memorable and has so many funny scenes and also a double murder , were expecting the bye bye to go very high in the ratings which would be a tonic as they have been low scorers recently apart from now you see him that reached 9th.
I hate this episode.
I think it’s actually a good plot and script. Joyce Van Patton does an excellent job. I have no problem with Celeste Holme.
My problem is with Peter Falk. Rather than play Lt. Columbo he whispers, mumbles, and otherwise sleep walks through the entire episode. If he brought even a fraction of the usual verve and energy to the character as he did in previous episodes “Old Fashioned” wouldn’t be a bottom three episode as you correctly ranked it. Instead we get Lt. Columbo sucking the life and energy out of every scene. I get that this is supposed to be “dark and gothic”. That doesn’t mean Falk had to be utterly lifeless and showing no interest at all in trying to give us an entertaining installment of “Columbo”.
Fortunately things pick up for the final episodes after this and we get to see Lt. Columbo in action again instead whoever it was he played in this episode.
I wonder if there was some underlying discontent from Falk about this one. It used to annoy the hell out of him that quality scripts weren’t ready way in advance of filming, and if this one required heavy reworking at short notice it must have grated. I don’t think he’s terrible in this, but he’s not on vintage form by a long shot.
Yeah, run at least three episodes ahead. Hiring a writer, even a quality writer, is very affordable compared to the rest of the expenses.
It continues to amaze me at how so many Hollywood productions, both on TV and in the movies, employ terrible writers when, to all accounts, the cost of good writing is relatively small (compared to the cost of the cast and special effects).
I’d much rather watch a well-written production (e.g. “Knives Out”) than a big-budget production with a huge cast and great special effects and mediocre writing.
I think that he’s under the weather
from the hay fever.
thank you, Columbophile,
I was impatient to read your analysis of this episode, because I understood you don’t like it, and I do.
The character of Ruth Lytton is much more coherent than you think.
For instance her attitude towards her niece (or daughter) Janie Brandt. Ruth has lost her lover, Peter Brandt, she’s loosing her museum (which is her actual identity and social existence), and she knows she’ll soon loose Janie (who carries the name ‘Brandt’ of her former lover). Janie is having a love-affair, and may be that affair (with a married man) will not last, but her emotional dependency towards Ruth certainly is weakening. The official (administrative) link with her daughter never having been recognized, Ruth will be nobody any more. (Unless the sister of her sister!) So pulling and pushing Janie in a new dependency (the finding of the two bodies, which creates emotional dependency; and the imprisonment, with physical and emotional dependency) is rather coherent with her identity and history. We should remember hate and love are close feelings. After having loved Janie, Ruth can hate her once she’s leaving and getting her independency.
And also: for years and years, or decades and decades, Ruth has learned how to self-control. To control herself because of the bourgeois way of life. To control herself to hide her feelings for Peter Brandt, her feelings for her sister and her feelings for her daughter (while those three people didn’t have to hide theirs). And to control herself from spending to much money. So it is very credible that she controls herself in the double murder scene. Self-control is all her life.
This is a much more better role than the one of the nun.
The only incredible thing in the episode is how Ruth Lytton and Milton Schaeffer immediately trust each other. But this is linked to a weakness in MOST OF Columbo episodes, where we first see a reason, a mobile to kill, and immediately after that discover how the murderer has a very elaborated plan (and often: the means) to commit the crime.
You seem to find that Peter Falks play in this episode is close to his in “Last Salute…”. I don’t think, and I even don’t see it. I hope I can review the episode soon (I viewed it recently, but don’t have the DVD in this apartment), but I remember I liked very much the scenes with him and Sergeant Miller.
Finally, I appreciate (like, or even love) very much the small humour which is present throughout all the episode, from Victor Hugo and Oscar Wilde in the beginning towards Ruth Lytton leaving the scene at Columbo’s arm. That’s very good.
So, if you don’t like the episode (after all, it’s your website, not mine), do you really think “Mind over Mayhem” is better than it?
Hi Jeff, thanks for such a thorough comment and you make some excellent points. As for preferring Mind Over Mayhem to this, yes I do, nominally. It’s not a great episode but for me it’s more enjoyable to watch overall than this one. I like a bit of fun in my Columbo episodes and Old Fashioned Murder has very little.
MOM and OFM both have poor scripts.
By dawns early light also has zero fun even less than Old fashioned murder but the difference is By dawns early light has a much much better script and memorable gotcha also mc goohans acting is great in it
I think the McGoohan/Falk interactions in Dawn’s Early Light are a lot of fun to watch. But I agree that the main thing that elevates it over Old Fashioned Murder is a far more coherent script. There are aspects of this story that are very well done: the initial double murder is well planned and Ruth Lytton is a terrific character. But I agree that the twist in the middle to blame Janie just doesn’t make any sense. Not only do we not understand why Ruth would target Janie (as opposed to Dear Aunt Edna from “Suitable for Framing”), but it’s an unnecessary thing to do. Regardless of Columbo’s suspicions about the time of death, he doesn’t have a single bit of evidence to implicate Ruth. (And he has far less evidence regarding the death of Janie’s father – that’s just idle speculation.)
Because Janie is the last credible patsy left, and
Ruth doesn’t want to go to prison ..?
Really? I could watch this episode 10 times, and enjoy
it every time. Watching Mind Over Mayhem is like
munching on steel marbles for 90 minutes.
I think that’s an excellent summation of Ruth.
I think this is a pretty fair review of an episode which is solid but never really comes to the boil. A couple of touches I feel are worth a mention are the way Ruth suddenly seems to materialise in a room without anyone being aware of her presence. A comment on her being overlooked all her life, but it also gives her a sinister quality. Also, while it’s true the climactic ‘gotcha’ scene is underplayed, Ruth has been so controlled throughout the film the very fact that she takes a handkerchief and calmly mops her brow and face is the equivalent of Roddy McDowall’s hysterics at the end of ‘Short Fuse’.
Not a stellar entry, but worthwhile viewing.
Excellent review! I think you’ve captured the basic difficulty with this episode. The hiding of the belt buckle in the closet seemed hastily contrived and you gave it the context of a failure to develop Ruth’s character thoroughly. And, obviously, Celeste Holm’s character is entirely forgettable.
I did enjoy, however, the scene in which our good lieutenant’s imagination is captured in the museum room. I found it to reveal a different, more spiritual, side of him as he says he could linger there forever. Also, there are other valuable scenes such as Ruth and Edward in their material v. sentiment argument ala Adrian and Rick Carsini.
Good comparison between Ruth’s reaction and Roddy McD’s! I wish I’d thought of that myself…
Thank you for your thorough review – good work as always . It’s hard not to agree with all your points on a personal level though I do find the episode rather entertaining with the cameos , haircut scenes etc. Also old money on hard times is always a good theme and I think reflects the uncertain times of the mid 70s in the USA. It’s a shame it’s not better though with script still watchable nonetheless !